Comparison of NDVI for different species of eucalyptus

  • Laura Camila de Godoy Goergen Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
  • Matheus Nunes Silva Sul Florestas
  • Emanuel Araújo Silva Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
  • Rudiney Soares Pereira Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
Keywords: Remote sensing, Vegetation indices, Landsat 5

Abstract

The study aimed to analyzed the vegetation from NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) dynamics in Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus Urograndis comparing the NDVI generated from the digital numbers obtained from the conversion to apparent reflectance. The satelite images of TM/Landsat 5 sensor was used. Converting digital numbers (DN) to reflectance values and the calculation of the NDVI were obtained through spatial analysis operations Algebraic Geoprocessing Language (LEGAL). It was observed that NDVI values generated from the reflectances are greater than those determined by the DN. This observed difference is physically justified by the corrections made in the image of some parameters such as the minimum and maximum sensor radiances and mean stratospheric solar irradiance. E. dunnii presented higher values of NDVI when compared to E. urograndis, indicating that this is a useful tool when the objective is to identify the species, facilitating the management of the area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BASTIAANSSEN, W.et al. SEBAL -Surface Energy Balance Algorithms for Land: Advanced Training and UsersManual. Idaho: Idaho Department of Water Resources, 2002. 98p.

CAMARA, G. et al. SPRING: Integrating remote sensing and GIS by object-oriented data modelling. Computers & Graphics, 20: (3) 395-403, May-Jun 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-8493(96)00008-8

CHAVES, M.E.D. et al. Análise comparativado NDVI estimado a partir de valores de níveis digitais originais e de reflectâncias aparente e de superfície. In: XVI SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE SENSORIAMENTO REMOTO; 2013; Foz do Iguaçu. Anais...São José dos Campos: INPE; 2013. p. 8261-8268.

CHANDER, G. et al. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, p. 893–903, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007

EPIPHANIO, J.C.N. et al. Índices de vegetação no sensoriamento remoto da cultura do feijão. Pesquisa agropecuária brasileira, Brasilia, v. 31, n. 6, p.445-454, 1996.

ESQUERDO, J.C.D.M. Utilização de perfis multi-temporais do NDVI/AVHRR no acompanhamento da safra de soja no oeste do Paraná. Campinas: UNICAMP, 2007. 186 p. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Agrícola) –Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

GLOBAL LAND COVER FACILITY. Global Land Cover Facility [home page]. Available at: <http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/index.shtml>. Acceso en: Dec. 2012.

HOLBEN, B.N. Characterization of maximum value composites from temporal AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, v. 7, n. 11, p.1417-1434, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431168608948945

IBÁ –Indústria Brasileira de Árvores. Relatório IBA 2017. São Paulo. 2017

JENSEN, J.R. Sensoriamento Remoto do Ambiente: uma perspectiva em recursos terrestres. 1 ed. São José dos Campos: Parêntese; 2009. 604 p.

PESQ. AGROP. GAÚCHA, Porto Alegre, v.22, ns.1/2, p. 39-48, 2016

MARKHAM, B. L.; BARKER, J. L. Landsat MSS and TM Post-Calibration Dynamic Ranges, Exoatmospheric Reflectances and At-Satellite Temperatures. EOSAT Landsat Technical Notes, n. 1, 1986.

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA). Landsat 5 (L5) Thematic Mapper (TM) calibration parameter files (CPFs). Disponível em: <http://landsat.usgs.gov/science_L5_cpf.php>.

PONZONI, F.J.; DOS SANTOS, S.B. Conversão de números digitais de imagens orbitais em valores de FRB de superfície. Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas, v. 14, n. 4, p.541-556, 2008.

PONZONI, F.J.; SHIMABUKURO, Y.E. Sensoriamento Remoto no Estudo da Vegetação. 1 ed. São Paulo: Parêntese; 2007. 144 p.

ROBINOVE, C.J. Computation with physical values from Landsat digital data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 48, n. 5, p.781–784, 1982.

ROUSE, J.W. et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In THIRD EARTH RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY SATELLITE SYMPOSIUM, 3,1973; Washington, USA. Anais... Washington: NASA, 1973. p.309-317.

Published
2016-10-06
How to Cite
GOERGEN, L. C. DE G.; SILVA, M. N.; SILVA, E. A.; PEREIRA, R. S. Comparison of NDVI for different species of eucalyptus. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, v. 22, n. 1/2, p. 39-48, 6 Oct. 2016.